plasmids for human prpf8, cep78, edd, and ddb1 (GenScript corporation)
Structured Review

Plasmids For Human Prpf8, Cep78, Edd, And Ddb1, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plasmids for human prpf8, cep78, edd, and ddb1/product/GenScript corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "CAKUT variants in PRPF8, DYRK2 , and CEP78 : implications for splicing and ciliogenesis"
Article Title: CAKUT variants in PRPF8, DYRK2 , and CEP78 : implications for splicing and ciliogenesis
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2025.07.16.665151
Figure Legend Snippet: A) The graph provides an overview of the splicing process. PRPF8 is a core component of the U5 snRNP and the spliceosome. B) Ubiquitination and degradation of CP110 regulates ciliogenesis. CP110 caps distal end of the mother centriole and thereby inhibits ciliogenesis. EDD-DYRK2-DDB1 VprBP complex is constitutively located at the (sub)distal end of the mother centriole. CEP350 recruits CEP78, and CEP78 activates VPRBP and the EDD-DYRK2-DDB1 VprBP complex. Phosphorylation of CP110 by DYRK2 enables recognition of CP110, which is brought close to EDD that transfers ubiquitin to CP110. PRPF8 functions as receptor for ubiquitin chains of CP110. Ubiquitination causes CP110-disassembly and removal from mother centriole, initiating ciliogenesis. C) Summary of renal and extra-renal manifestations in patients with PRPF8 variants. The patient with the de novo PRPF8 R1681W variant displayed the most severe phenotype with multiple malformations. None of the patients presented with RP symptoms. D) Examples of sequence conservation of PRPF8 amino acids mutated in CAKUT. E) Protein domain structure of human PRPF8 showing the position of de novo variants (red), heterozygous CAKUT variants (black) and RP mutations (magenta). Green arrow depicts a missense mutation ( Prpf8 +/N1531S ) in a mouse model exhibiting a ciliopathy phenotype. PRO8NT: PRP8 N-terminal domain or Bromodomain; PROCN PRO8 central domain; RT reverse transcriptase domain; RNaseH-like Ribonuclease H domain; Jab1/MPN Jun activation domain-binding protein 1/Mpr1, Pad1 N-terminal domain; RP Retinitis Pigmentosa.
Techniques Used: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Phospho-proteomics, Variant Assay, Sequencing, Mutagenesis, Reverse Transcription, Activation Assay, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A) Exon and domain structure of human DYRK2 . Arrowheads show positions of heterozygous CAKUT variants. B) Alphafold-predicted 3D structure of the DYRK2–CEP78 complex. The red square in the PAE plot suggests a potential direct interaction. Variants are scattered and do not cluster at the interface. C) DYRK2 kinase activity assessed via NDEL1 phosphorylation. Immunoblotting shows comparable phospho-NDEL1S336 levels for all CAKUT variants relative to WT, indicating preserved kinase function. K251R served as a kinase-dead control; empty vector as negative control. D) Co-IP of DYRK2 variants with EDD, DDB1, and VprBP. Two variants (p.Arg326Cys, p.Arg326His) showed reduced complex formation (n=3).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Western Blot, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Negative Control, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay

![(A) Biochemical demonstration of CLC-1 polyubiquitination in HEK293T cells. (Left) Representative immunoblots showing the effect of HA-tagged lysine-less <t>ubiquitin</t> (HA-Ub-K0) co-expression on Myc-CLC-1. (Right) Quantification of relative CLC-1 protein expression level. Standardized protein densities of the Ub-K0 co-expression group ( hatched bars ) were normalized to those for the corresponding HA-vector control ( clear bars ). Asterisks denote significant difference from the control (*, t -test: p < 0.05; n = 5-6). (B) CLC-1 polyubiquitination [CLC-1-(Ub)n] by HA-Ub was reduced by DN-CUL4A, but not DN-CUL3. Co-expression with the Flag vector was used as the control experiment. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with the anti-Myc antibody, and protein ubiquitination was recognized by immunoblotting (IB) the immunoprecipitates with the anti-HA antibody. Corresponding expression levels of CLC-1 and actin in the lysates are shown in the Input lane. In all cases hereafter, input represents about 10% of the total protein used for immunoprecipitation. (C) CLC-1 polyubiquitination by endogenous ubiquitin was disrupted in the presence of DN-CUL4A/B. Co-expression with the Flag vector was used as the control experiment. Protein ubiquitination was identified by immunoblotting the immunoprecipitates with the anti-ubiquitin (Ub) antibody. The gels were run under the same experimental conditions. Uncropped images of immunoblots are shown in .](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_8132/pmc04448132/pmc04448132__srep10667-f2.jpg)